The Joo Ho-min special education trial has drawn nationwide attention in South Korea after the teacher accused of emotionally abusing his autistic son was found not guilty.
Background of the Joo Ho-min Special Education Trial
The case began when Mr. Joo’s son, who has autism spectrum disorder, was reportedly emotionally abused by a special education teacher at an elementary school in Yongin, Gyeonggi Province. The incident occurred on September 13, 2022, during a class designed for customized learning.
The teacher was accused of saying to the child:
“You have a really bad habit… I hate you so much. I hate you too. I really hate you.”
The comments were secretly recorded by Mr. Joo’s wife, who had placed a recording device in their son’s coat out of concern for his behavior.
First Trial: Guilty Verdict with Suspended Sentence
In the initial trial, the court acknowledged the evidentiary value of the secretly recorded audio. The judge recognized the difficulty in proving emotional abuse without such recordings and issued a suspended fine of 2 million won to the teacher.
The court emphasized that the child’s disability limited his ability to defend himself and justified the mother’s act of recording as a legitimate attempt to protect her child.
Second Trial: Teacher Found Not Guilty
However, the second trial overturned the verdict. The Suwon District Court ruled that the recording violated the Communications Secrets Protection Act, classifying it as a “non-public conversation between others” — thus making it inadmissible as evidence.
As a result, the teacher was found not guilty, despite the emotional distress caused to the child.
Joo Ho-min’s Reaction to Special Education Trial Verdict
Speaking outside the courtroom, Joo Ho-min said:
“I am very upset… but I respect the court’s decision.”
He further added that the case highlighted the difficulty in proving abuse against disabled children, especially when schools or educators are involved. Joo called for systemic reform to protect vulnerable students and ensure emotional abuse is taken seriously.
Legal Debate Around the Joo Ho-min Special Education Trial
The ruling has sparked significant online discourse in South Korea, with many netizens questioning whether the law adequately protects disabled children in school environments. Advocates have called for a review of the Communications Secrets Protection Act, arguing it may hinder justice in abuse cases involving vulnerable individuals.
This case is also raising awareness about the rights of children with autism and the importance of accountability in education.
What This Means for Korea’s Education System
This case shines a light on the difficulty of proving emotional abuse in South Korea’s special education system. With autism awareness growing, parents and advocacy groups are calling for stronger protections and easier ways to document abuse in classrooms.
Conclusion
The Joo Ho-min special education trial has stirred public debate on the intersection of privacy laws and child protection in South Korea. While the court’s ruling follows legal standards, the emotional toll and broader social concerns suggest that legal reforms may be necessary to ensure no child’s voice goes unheard — especially those who cannot speak for themselves.
Related: Why Gen Z in Japan Prefers TikTok Over YouTube
More details can be found on Joo Ho-min – Wikipedia.
